Jump to content

Samsung SPH-L500 hits the FCC


Jaggrey

Recommended Posts

I'll be looking for a new phone for my mother-in-law soon since she's eligible for an upgrade. I'd like to get her off her Replenish as soon as possible!!! :) I'd also like her to have an all touchscreen phone, but she'll probably want a keyboard, which leaves the Mach or Photon Q. Both are kinda "meh" to me, but as long as they're reliable, good phones it'll be fine for her. She does little more than Facebook and check her email on her phone.

Edited by Jaggrey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Time to bring this thread back up.

 

The successor to the SPH-L500 has been tested on cloud4sites.com's mtest page.

 

The SPH-L520, located here, has Android 4.2.2 Build JDQ39 on board. Could this be the Galaxy S4 mini on Sprint?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Time to bring this thread back up.

 

The successor to the SPH-L500 has been tested on cloud4sites.com's mtest page.

 

The SPH-L520, located here, has Android 4.2.2 Build JDQ39 on board. Could this be the Galaxy S4 mini on Sprint?

We never even determined what the L500 was did we?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Time to bring this thread back up.

 

 

The successor to the SPH-L500 has been tested on cloud4sites.com's mtest page.

 

 

The SPH-L520, located here, has Android 4.2.2 Build JDQ39 on board. Could this be the Galaxy S4 mini on Sprint?

We never even determined what the L500 was did we?

Nope. And we may never know what it is. We will just have to wait and see. Maybe Sprint decided a tri-band version was better*?

 

The Galaxy Nexus was L700, the Galaxy S 3 was L710, and the Galaxy S 4 was L720. This time they skipped from L500 to L520. Strange, but the mystery is exciting.

 

(*Pure speculation at this point.)

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate to start rumors, but this looks strange and legitimate at the same time.

 

http://ameblo.jp/povtc/entry-11551006735.html

 

According to this site, the SPH-L520 could be the S4 Mini for Sprint, and may only have LTE on PCS. We will know for sure when it hits the FCC.

 

Also, the L520 passed the Bluetooth SIG earlier this month. https://www.bluetooth.org/tpg/QLI_viewQDL.cfm?qid=20981

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate to start rumors, but this looks strange and legitimate at the same time.

 

http://ameblo.jp/povtc/entry-11551006735.html

 

According to this site, the SPH-L520 could be the S4 Mini for Sprint, and may only have LTE on PCS. We will know for sure when it hits the FCC.

 

Also, the L520 passed the Bluetooth SIG earlier this month. https://www.bluetooth.org/tpg/QLI_viewQDL.cfm?qid=20981

 

I'd rather Sprint release that dang SPH-L730 already so I can have my triband goodness.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe the L500 is the new Samsung Windows phone that was just announced.

No, because cloud4sites' mtest proved it was android. And I believe the FCC docs had Android listed in them. (Can't remember for sure since its been a while.)

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

The SPH-L520 has a partial list of specs listed online at GFXbench.com.

 

http://gfxbench.com/device.jsp?benchmark=gfx27&D=Samsung+SPH-L520&testgroup=system

 

Has a Qualcomm MSM8960 with a max CPU frequency of 1728MHz, Android 4.2.2, and a screen resolution of 960 x 540. Listing shows 1920 x 1080 screen resolution and an Adreno 305.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...