Jump to content

Sprint's committment to Apple might be less than expected


pyroscott

Recommended Posts

It seems the amount committed to Apple keeps falling. The latest estimate is that Sprint has to sell around 24 million iPhones to meet the $15.5 billion, four year deal with Apple revealed in their 10K filing. Considering Sprint sold 1.8 million phones in 4Q 2011, they would need to keep that pace for just under 3 and a half years to sell their 24 million iPhones.

 

"In September 2011, we entered into a four year commitment with Apple, Inc. to purchase a minimum number of smartphones, which on average, are expected to carry a higher subsidy per unit than other smartphones we sell. Our minimum commitment under this arrangement is approximately $15.5 billion; however, we expect our actual purchases will exceed this amount."

 

They also revealed that network vision will cost approximately $10 billion over 2 years in the following quote:

 

"Our accelerated timeline coupled with our capital needs to maintain and operate our existing infrastructure are expected to require approximately $10 billion in total capital expenditures over the two year period ending December 31, 2013."

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great link. :goodpost:

 

I'm happy to hear that Sprint still keeps referring to a 24 month Network Vision build out. I think the NV OEM's and their subcontractors will make it, as long as Sprint can keep their cash flow up enough to keep paying invoices. Sounds like if Sprint keeps saying things like this, they are confident that they will be able to keep funding NV and LTE deployment. :fingers:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sure hope that they keep the 2 year timeline going as well. I'd like to see NV finished about the same time verizon is supposed to finish their LTE roll-out.

 

Sent from Joshs Evo Shift 4G using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...