Jump to content

FreedomPop WiMAX coverage different than Sprint WiMAX coverage?


rwong48

Recommended Posts

For those who don't know, FreedomPop launched their free service not too long ago with Sprint/Clear's WiMAX network (please correct me if I'm wrong.) http://slickdeals.ne...h-49-99-deposit

 

I'm in an area with generally weak WiMAX outside, and usually none inside. In particular, it's not available at my workplace (indoors nor outdoors). I've tried this with my EVO Shift and a coworker's EVO Design.

 

However, the FreedomPop device gets a great signal and great speeds (7-9Mbps down, 1-1.5Mbps up). I thought they were both running on the same network.. does anyone know what's going on here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coverage is definitely not different. I bet the Freedom POP device has a much stronger radio. This was definitely noticeable with some WiMax hotspots being vastly superior to the EVO.

 

Robert via Moto Photon Q using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks guys. I figured there may have been some radio difference, but not to the extent of "great" vs "zero" coverage outdoors where I am.

 

What device are you comparing the Evo Design and Shift to? Perhaps it has better radios...

I'm using the Freedom Spot Photon (portable hotspot). Basically the same as the Clear Spot Voyager.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks guys. I figured there may have been some radio difference, but not to the extent of "great" vs "zero" coverage outdoors where I am.

 

 

I'm using the Freedom Spot Photon (portable hotspot). Basically the same as the Clear Spot Voyager.

 

...and that, to be honest, is a weak WiMAX hotspot. Though it's mobile. I swapped mine for a Clear desktop modem and both reception and data speeds are much better on the much (MUCH) larger device :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks guys. I figured there may have been some radio difference, but not to the extent of "great" vs "zero" coverage outdoors where I am.

 

The maximum threshold for WiMax is around -85dBm RSSI for most smartphones (some were even limited to -82dBm). So if you were getting between -82dBm and -85dBm on your previous WiMax device, then you likely had pretty mediocre service that didn't want to stay connected. If your new device is getting even just -78dBm to -80dBm, the difference would be night and day.

 

If you think about a conventional WiMax deployment, there were so many places where you didn't think you had a signal, but you did, but it was too weak for you to know it was there. Each site had dozens or even hundreds of square miles with -85dBm to -95dBm signals that your device did not detect. If you had a stronger radio, a good portion of these no signal areas could now be live to you.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Figured I might resurrect this thread instead of posting somewhere else erroniously.

 

Does anyone know if Freedompop customers have access to Clear protection sites? I am getting the Overdrive to have some cheap data in the car for my iPad on the EvDO side of Freedompop for $4.

 

Still would be nice to have access to WiMax at home, which is served by a protection site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone know if Freedompop customers have access to Clear protection sites

 

Yes they do. I am able to connect to the protection sites here in Arizona with my Freedompop account.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Can you explain? What is a protection site? I am a Clear user.

 

 

Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk

They were WiMax "islands" sites setup just to cover population to protect the license from being pulled by the FCC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...