Jump to content

Contributors to this blog

Take Two! Sprint offers BYOD for Apple Devices

S4GRU

16,179 views

blog-0180317001426184215.png

.

by Robert Herron

Sprint 4G Rollout Updates

Thursday, March 12, 2015 - 11:40 AM MDT

 

Back in December, S4GRU brought to you news that Sprint was opening up their network for Apple iPhone devices from other networks to be brought in and used on theirs. BYOD - Bring Your Own Device. Or, as Sprint is calling it, BYOAD...Bring Your Own Apple Device. However, just before it could go into effect, Sprint pulled the program and the plan was put on hold. Well, it's back!

 

BYOAD lauches tomorrow, March 13th. Sprint is opening this up to unlocked models of the iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, iPad Air, iPad Air 2, iPad Mini Retina and iPad Mini 3. The iPhone 5s and iPhone 5c Verizon models are also eligible. The iPhone 5s/5c AT&T and Tmo model have CDMA disabled and thus are not eligible. BYOAD can be used with any Sprint rate plan, except for the Cut Your Rate in Half. Some special terms and conditions apply. The graphic below explains them.

 

When we reported last December, it did not include any iPhone 5s or 5c models. The addition of the Verizon models is new to the plan. We assume it will be allowed for existing account holders as well as those opening new accounts, as there is no mention of that limitation. However, the biggest limitation will be Sprint Spark compatibility, as Apple devices for other providers tend to not support LTE Band 41.

 

Sprint has been at a disadvantage in not allowing unlocked compatible devices on their network. AT&T and T-Mobile both allow customers to bring in a device from other providers if they are compatible and unlocked. Although most devices from Sprint's competitors are not compatible with the Sprint network, there are some notable exceptions.

 

Now we just look forward to the time when most devices can be brought into the Sprint network.

gallery_1_2_75295.jpg

  • Like 18


16 Comments


Recommended Comments

I'm glad to hear they are finally ready to launch this program. I wonder if Sprint has a special promo in the works for this in the near future.

  • Like 2

Share this comment


Link to comment

If they allow the 5s, why not allow the 5?

From posts in spark markets, it sounds like single-band experience is OK.

Share this comment


Link to comment

If they allow the 5s, why not allow the 5?

From posts in spark markets, it sounds like single-band experience is OK.

 

The first thought that comes to my mind is that the 5s and 5c support B25 and B26.  So at least that is dualband.  Sprint probably shouldn't allow any PCS LTE only devices on their network at this time.

  • Like 2

Share this comment


Link to comment

I'm glad to hear they are finally ready to launch this program. I wonder if Sprint has a special promo in the works for this in the near future.

 

What would the promo consist of?

Share this comment


Link to comment

Do you know if iphone 5s from boost mobile would work ? Because boost does not have unlimited data plan :(.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Do you know if iphone 5s from boost mobile would work ? Because boost does not have unlimited data plan :(.

 

I only know what is in the image in the article, which does not address iPhones from Boost.  Since it is supposed to launch tomorrow, you can call Sprint directly and give it a try.  If it works, let us know.  :tu:

Share this comment


Link to comment

I wish this could open up to sprint allowing boost mobile, virgin mobile, and sprint prepaid devices on post paid.

Share this comment


Link to comment

The first thought that comes to my mind is that the 5s and 5c support B25 and B26.  So at least that is dualband.  Sprint probably shouldn't allow any PCS LTE only devices on their network at this time.

 

but the verizon models of the iphone 5s and 5c only support band 25 LTE. I think this has more to do with the technical limitations of iphone 5. The  5s and 5c support csim and can be domestically unlocked for voice and data for both GSM and CDMA . the 5 does not support CSIM and is technically locked for domestic for said carrier. the 5 would need to use the old trick of flashing to work on Sprint for CDMA and we know that was probably not a support option.  

Share this comment


Link to comment

but the verizon models of the iphone 5s and 5c only support band 25 LTE. I think this has more to do with the technical limitations of iphone 5. The  5s and 5c support csim and can be domestically unlocked for voice and data for both GSM and CDMA . the 5 does not support CSIM and is technically locked for domestic for said carrier. the 5 would need to use the old trick of flashing to work on Sprint for CDMA and we know that was probably not a support option.  

 

https://www.apple.com/iphone-5s/specs/

 

You are correct.  The iPhone 5s/5c have two different CDMA models.  I thought there was just one until the 6 series.  My mistake.

 

Great points.  :thx:

Share this comment


Link to comment

Will the Verizon iPhone 6Plus support Band 26 or 41?

 

The Verizon model supports B25 & B26, but not B41:  https://www.apple.com/iphone-6/specs/

 

But the Sprint model fully supports Verizon.  Sprint gets screwed again.  Apple could have put Verizon and Sprint on the same exact model.

  • Like 2

Share this comment


Link to comment

The Verizon model supports B25 & B26, but not B41:  https://www.apple.com/iphone-6/specs/

 

But the Sprint model fully supports Verizon.  Sprint gets screwed again.  Apple could have put Verizon and Sprint on the same exact model.

It sucks, and is probably the reason Sprint has never been open to unlocking. Unless they are legally required to include B41 and BC10, Sprint will always be comparatively screwed in this department by the other three while most Sprint phones will work fine on them.

Share this comment


Link to comment

It would be nice it this moves beyond Apple only - i.e. there were a lot of pretty upset folks who bought Nexus 5's (2nd hand or otherwise) and were told its impossible to activate on Sprint.  I hope they continue to expand the acceptable device list.

Share this comment


Link to comment

I was so tiered of waiting for sprint to carry the newer Blackberry models such as the Z30 that I jumped to T-mobile.  Even though they don't sell blackberry themselves anymore, their network is open so I can enjoy the phone I want without having to wait for sprint to decide to carry the phones I want. In the past with sprint (and earlier with VZW) I would be waiting to see if they would carry a phone model I wanted.  No more..  GSM has opened my eyes.  

Share this comment


Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • The Wall Articles

  • Wall Comments

    • to me rural coverage matters most....because i like being able to make phone calls and send texts in remote areas of the country ...i dont care about speeds i just care about per square mile coverage and over all usability and reliability
    • Tell us how you really feel @MrZorbatron!

      I think that most cellular players exaggerate their coverage. Yes, I suspected a long time ago that T-Mobile was one of the most egregious. Now according to the merger presentation, they will end up with 85,000 macro sites. That will be enough to match the coverage of pretty much everybody.

      Like you, I appreciate not having dropped calls or undelivered texts. In my area on my T-Mobile MVNO, I don't get any but can't say it won't happen elsewhere. Once Charter offers service via their Verizon MVNO, I think I will move my 4 personal lines there. My business line will stay on Sprint/T-Mobile, well, because I can't control that.
    • I do not welcome any part of this.  I don't think T-Mobile really cares about doing anything they say they care about.  I have seen how truly bad their network is in the ways that matter for essential communication, and I want nothing to do with it.  Say what you want about Verizon, but the one thing they have in common with Sprint is that they have historically built out a solid network before trying to make it extremely fast.  I don't care about 50 Mbps to my phone.  I care about calls that don't get disconnected constantly.  I care about that stock trade getting through when I send it, even if carried by EVDO, because EVDO still gets it through. Sprint's "Outdoor coverage" maps might seem exaggerated to some, but T-Mobile's maps are a complete joke.  Maybe Michigan is a bubble, the only state where this is true, but it really is very true here.  T-Mobile is the network of dropped and undelivered calls, mysterious disconnection, and "call failed" error messages. If this goes through, look for me at the nearest Verizon store because price to me is absolutely irrelevant.  I see two things happening if this merger goes through:  1:  Sprint spectrum is used to bolster capacity at T-Mobile sites, and 2:  As much of the current Sprint network as possible goes away, even if it means losing sites that would provide valuable fill-in density.  I saw the latter happen with Sprint and Nextel, after they insisted that all Nextel sites that could serve to increase Sprint coverage would be used.  Similarly, there were locations T-Mobile could have used MetroPCS locations to improve their own coverage but didn't, even where it left holes in their network.
    • Not when Verizon just bought 1GHz of mmwave spectrum. Those were the policies of the past. If it does not get approved, it would the loss of jobs and the fact that it might not be good for consumers. Although when I look at the table on this page, comparing unlimited plans, it is already evident that the other three are not really competing and Sprint's lower prices are not working since they did not manage to steal anybody from the other other three. To me it is evident that were Sprint to remain independent they need massive investment in their network since competing on price is not enough anymore and low prices just deprive their network of investment.
    • And I would definitely say that merger probably or probably not won't be approved. If not I would have to say it would be on the grounds of cellular asset divestiture.
×